Fat and Carbohydrate Utilization During Exercise

fat carb

Fat and Carbohydrate Utilization During Exercise

How the body uses fat and carbohydrates during exercise is a hotly debated concept in the fitness industry right now and, frankly, this puzzles me. The research over the past 30 years has borne out exactly how our bodies use carbohydrates, proteins, and fat during different exercise intensities. The fact that there still remains a large debate should give you some insight into how well most of the field has processed the research. With that, let’s fix that issue, and dive into what the actual research says about how your body uses fat and carbs during training.

The energy systems

Before we delve into carbohydrate and fat utilization during exercise, we need a brief introduction to the three energy systems.

During both rest and exercise, your body needs energy to function on some level. The primary source of energy in the body is adenosine triphosphate, the street name for which is ATP. The body has 3 main energy systems: the phosphagen system, the glycolytic system, and oxidative phosphorylation. These systems are quite complicated, and a deep biochemical explanation is not the point of this article (however, the interested reader should check out Jonathan Mike’s detailed discussion in his two part series: Part 1, Part 2). Below is a figure of the energy systems and their relationships with one another.

Creatine phosphate drives the majority of ATP production for the phosphagen system, while carbohydrates and fat are the primary fuel sources for glycolysis and oxidative phosphorylation, respectively.

The take home from this picture is that each energy system each utilize different inputs (creatine phosphate, glucose, and fatty acids), are intimately connected, and they all have the same end goal: ATP production.

energy systems

Energy systems and training.

During exercise/training, your body has an increased need for ATP. The phosphagen system is limited in capacity relative to glycolysis and oxidative phosphorylation, which means glycolysis and oxidative phosphorylation are going to do the majority of the work in order to supply ATP.

Each energy system has a different input for energy production, and therefore, it would make sense that the energy system being utilized most will determine whether carbohydrates or fat are to be the primary fuel source. Perhaps a study exploring how these fuels are used would help explain this? Well, it’s a good thing for us that scientists have already done these experiments!

In a study from 1993 (some of you weren’t even born yet), a group of researchers had participants exercise at 25%, 65%, and 85% of their V02 max, and followed how their body utilized fat and carbohydrates at the different levels of intensity. I think the best way to get the idea across is to show you the data, and let it speak for itself.

carbohydrates during exercise

The first figure shows us fat and glucose uptake, and oxidation at increasing levels of intensity. As you can see by the top figure we see lower levels of fatty acid uptake. Yet, as intensity increases, there begins to form a U-shaped correlation in fat utilization.

This suggests that as we increase intensity to moderate levels, we increase fat oxidation. However, once we get into higher levels of intensity, we return to levels of fat oxidation similar to very low intensities.

Interestingly, as we see decreased levels of fat uptake we still see levels of fat oxidation higher than uptake, indicating increased utilization of muscle triglycerides for energy even at higher levels of intensity.

The carbohydrate story is a little more straight-forward (bottom panel), in that as we increase exercise intensity we increase glucose uptake and oxidation, and that oxidation far exceeds uptake, indicating that muscle stores of glycogen are being utilized.

Now what does this mean in terms of overall utilization during exercise? The authors of the afore-mentioned paper also addressed this question. As we increase exercise intensity the overall need for energy increases.carbs 3

At moderate intensities (65%) there is an increased need for muscle glycogen and muscle triglycerides (that is, fat). At higher levels of intensities (85%) there is an even greater need for energy, and this is met almost solely by an increased uptake of glucose from the blood and from muscle glycogen.

carbs 4

There also appears to be a time component. As you increase the duration of exercise you start to use less muscle glycogen and muscle triglycerides and rely more on blood glucose and blood fatty acids. Why might this be? Well, as your muscles run low on their stores you need to get the energy from the most available source, your blood.*

image c/o http://www.crossfitinvoke.com/
image c/o http://www.crossfitinvoke.com/

Here is another important concept: All three energy systems are utilized concurrently, it is not like driving car with a manual transmission, where you switch from one gear to another; they are all used at all times. However, as you change exercise intensities their relative contribution to ATP production changes.

Let’s simplify this a bit and give you an idea of which systems dominate the contribution to ATP based on exercise intensity.

Energy system and ATP contribution during exercise

How This Relates to Nutrition.

An often underappreciated, but rather simple nutritional strategy for people who train hard, is to eat in order to fuel your training. Now I know this is a simplification of nutritional science, but for most people this approach gets you pretty close to your goals**.

This brings the role of energy systems and the previous paper back into context in easily digestible concepts. During higher intensity training we rely more on the phosphagen and glycolytic systems in order to provide ATP to fuel the body. There is a sort of “sweet spot” that maximizes glucose utilization for fuel, and it lies somewhere between the 50-85% of maximal intensity ***.

If you are training at the lower level intensity, you utilize mostly free fatty acids. If you are training on the higher end of intensity levels, you use primarily your phosphagen system. Also, as we increase intensity in exercise we do 2 things: 1) increase the overall energy expenditure, and 2) increase the amount of carbohydrates used.

The easiest nutritional target to figure out in order to optimize your training is your carbohydrate intake, and to then match it to your output from training. Generally speaking, the intensity of the training you do is going to largely determine the ratio of carbohydrate to fat being burned (as noted in two papers cited previously).

The second thing to take into consideration is the duration of the training. This is likely because the harder you train, the less you are able to sustain that workload. Stop and think about that concept for a moment. Can you sprint longer than you can walk? The answer to that question would be a resounding, “no.” So in order to determine the amount of carbohydrate utilized during training, take the integral of function of intensity of your training and the duration of your training (are you having calculus nightmares?).

carbohydrate needs exercise

In real world application it’s quite simple: the higher the intensity and duration of training, the more carbohydrates you will need to replace. Each person is going to be a little different and, there are tools out there to figure this out (I have one you can check out).

Both fat and carbohydrates are used to fuel exercise, but how you train is going to dictate which one makes a greater contribution. At high intensities, more carbohydrates are used, at lower intensities more fat is used****. Fuel accordingly, and your nutrition is already most of the way there.

carbs 8

*This study has essentially been repeated in trained women with identical results.

** Yes, there are other ways to replace carbohydrates spent during exercise, but for the vast majority of people (i.e. 95%) this is the best approach. Think about fueling your car. Sure, you can rewire your engine and hook up an additional battery which you charge with a solar panel in order to reduce your gasoline consumption, but for most people just filling up the tank is going to get them from point A to point B.

*** This is a range that I have arrived at after reviewing a lot of literature. This can vary a great deal from person to person, but it is a good reference point

**** One HUGE caveat here is that what is utilized during exercise does not indicate what it optimal for fat-loss. I.E. low intensity exercise that primarily uses fat during exercise DOES NOT suggest it is the best form of exercise to promote fat-loss. This is a topic for a different time and a different blog.

Want More Science-Based Nutrition Information?

Subscribe to our monthly journal!

6 comments

  1. Way over my head…. Which is why I didn’t subscribe. I’m not a member of your target audience. Sorry Brad.

    1. Patti, I think you’d actually be surprised if you read the journal Dr. Dieter has created. It definitely appeals to a wide range of audience and anyone can grasp the concepts. I’d highly recommend maybe sub’ing for at least a month. It’s not much $$, and all you’d have to do is forgo a few lattes at your local coffee shop in order to do so. Hope that helps!

  2. Great goods from you, man. I have bear in mind your stuff previous to and you’re just extremely fantastic. I really like what you have obtained right here, really like what you are saying and the way in which during which you assert it. You are making it enjoyable and you continue to take care of to stay it wise. I cant wait to learn far more from you. This is really a great web site.

  3. OSU scientist Jeff Volek published a great little study about a month after this blog was published. The metabolism of 10 LCHF endurance athletes was compared with the metabolism of 10 HCLF endurance athletes. “Scientists measured gas exchange repeatedly during a test determining the athletes’ maximum oxygen intake to gauge carb- and fat-burning rates. On average, the low-carb runners’ peak fat-burning rate was 2.3-fold higher than the rate for high-carb athletes: 1.5 versus .67 grams per minute.” The key factor was epigenetic adaptation to a high-carb or high-fat diet, which takes a minimum of 5-6 weeks.
    https://news.osu.edu/news/2015/11/16/against-grain/
    The science paper “Metabolic characteristics of keto-adapted ultra-endurance runners” is freely available at http://ac.els-cdn.com/S0026049515003340/1-s2.0-S0026049515003340-main.pdf?_tid=b95281fa-4dd3-11e6-ae0d-00000aacb35f&acdnat=1468948422_4bad48b3511fc5b737b98463dbf78be9

    This is a win-win for all athletes, but especially endurance athletes. Fat storage is far more efficient than storage of carbs. More energy is available, and blood sugar depletion during exercise is conserved. Finally, burning BoHB generates a bit more H2O and a bit less CO2 than burning glucose. There is less CO2 to remove from the body — a phenomenon called reduced ventilatory drive.

    1. Thanks for the the thoughtful comment Phil! I don’t deny that utilization ketogenic diets can have some merit in some application but I think there is a lot more to think through than just looking at fat oxidation rates. One thing we know with a high level of certainty is that carbohydrates and their oxidation is always the limiting factor from an energy standpoint. There is indeed theoretical basis for increasing the fat oxidation capacity to spare glycogen stores but that should also not come at the expense of reducing CHO oxidation by reducing the PDC that is seen in most people who do long term keto. I think it really should be a balance of improving both systems IMO

Comments are closed.